Editorial Policy
Gajema publishes independent educational context, not promotional investment content.
The policy applies to guides, research notes, glossary entries, corrections, and any clearly labeled sponsored material. Its purpose is to help readers understand how topics are selected, checked, updated, and separated from commercial communication.
1. Mission
We help readers understand the architecture, applications, people, and open questions around the Solana ecosystem.
Coverage is explanatory rather than predictive. We seek to show how a system works, where evidence comes from, and which questions remain unresolved. Readers may contact the editorial desk with source suggestions or factual corrections.
2. Independence
Editorial decisions are separate from advertising and external relationships. Solana references identify subject matter and do not indicate endorsement.
Contributors should not accept a commercial condition that changes a factual conclusion. Paid placement is labeled and cannot determine article ranking, inclusion, omission, or correction outcome. Relevant relationships are reviewed before publication.
3. Sourcing
Writers prefer primary documentation, public proposals, technical releases, and attributable expert commentary. Claims are framed according to available evidence.
Sources are checked for date, authorship, scope, and whether a statement is observation or opinion. A single source may be insufficient for a disputed claim. Links are retained where practical so readers can inspect the underlying material.
4. Language
We avoid guarantees, urgency, exaggerated outcomes, and unsupported financial or health claims. Readers should encounter description rather than sales pressure.
Articles use neutral labels such as “reported,” “documented,” or “under discussion” when the evidence requires care. We do not present general information as individualized advice and do not request confidential credentials.
5. Updates
Articles are dated and reviewed when a material technical change affects their explanation. Minor spelling changes may not alter the date.
Material revisions should preserve the original meaning where possible and identify a review date. A release, documentation change, or correction may trigger a new review. Review records are normally retained for the life of the affected article.
6. Corrections
Send evidence through contact.php. We distinguish corrections from clarifications and preserve a visible record when a change affects meaning.
Reports should include the article title, passage, source, and explanation. We normally acknowledge a report within 7 business days and aim to complete an initial review within 30 days. A correction is made when evidence supports a change, not merely because a conclusion is unpopular.
7. Conflicts
Contributors should disclose relevant relationships. A conflict does not automatically invalidate a source, but it must be considered in framing.
Possible safeguards include additional sourcing, an editorial review by another person, clear disclosure, or declining the assignment. Disclosures are limited to information relevant to reader understanding.
8. User contributions
Messages may inform future coverage but are checked before publication. We do not publish private credentials or confidential material.
Submitted material may be retained for up to 24 months after the last meaningful exchange, or longer when it documents a published correction. We do not treat a message as permission to publish a person’s private contact information.
9. Advertising
Any paid placement is labeled clearly and kept visually separate from independent editorial judgment.
Commercial copy is reviewed for clarity, legality, and consistency with the site’s educational setting. Advertisers do not receive contact-form records or unpublished editorial correspondence. Details are set out in the Advertising Policy.
10. Contact
Editorial correspondence: 24-1, Nonhyeon-ro 155-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06041, Republic of Korea · +82-2-7105-8329.
Gajema was reviewed on 22 September 2026. A prior review on 1 June 2026 clarified sourcing, correction timing, and separation from advertising.
Editorial review in practice
Coverage decisions consider public relevance, available evidence, reader clarity, and the ability to explain a subject without creating a promotional impression. A topic may be included because it helps readers understand infrastructure, software, community practice, or an unresolved question. Inclusion does not indicate approval, endorsement, or a prediction.
Before publication, an editor checks the stated scope, dates, links, terminology, and material claims. Where evidence is mixed, the article should identify the uncertainty instead of presenting a single interpretation as settled. A later review may correct a factual error, add context, update a link, or mark a passage as historical.
Readers can suggest a correction by naming the page, quoting the relevant passage, and providing a source that can be checked. We aim to acknowledge a report within 7 business days and provide a decision or progress update within 30 days. Corrections are recorded in proportion to the significance of the issue, while minor typographical fixes may not receive a separate notice.
Commercial relationships, affiliate references, and sponsored material are reviewed for disclosure and separation. A commercial request cannot require favorable language, conceal a material condition, suppress a correction, or determine the order of independent coverage. If circumstances change after publication, the relationship and the article may be reviewed again.
Questions about editorial standards may be sent to 24-1, Nonhyeon-ro 155-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06041, Republic of Korea, or +82-2-7105-8329. This policy was reviewed on 22 September 2026. Future revisions will include a dated note describing whether the change concerns sourcing, corrections, disclosures, or reader contact.